If a Voter Could Inform Himself through Time Travel
Let's suppose you could step forward in time 25 years and consider the administration of George W. Bush with 20-20 hindsight--using the historical perspective. How would you view him if you could review the complete series of proximate events attributable to his deeds as president? How would you judge him if you were the historian, with full access to declassified documents, presidential correspondence and, above all, with a perfect grasp of the yet future historical record? Well, it's not a fair question, because you can't travel in time. The needed data aren't available, and much of it won't even exist for years. I'm asking you to judge future consequences, and you balk. I can't blame you. Still, here in 2004, you are being asked to vote for the man--or against him. In effect, your opinion is being sought now on how the future is going to turn out -- with him or without him in the most powerful office on earth for four more years.
Maybe you need to learn how to project forward to likely future consequences based on historical precedent. You do know some history, don't you? Well, then, perhaps you are not doomed to repeat the more distasteful episodes! There are eerie parallels to a well-known political career with startling implications for the upcoming election. I want to talk to you about President George W. Bush and Senator Joseph McCarthy.
W's Surface Resemblance to Joe McCarthy
First, let's go over some obvious points of similarity. Joe McCarthy was a mediocre politician with a weak record as a senator. Check! George W. Bush had a dismal record as president and no obvious re-election prospects prior to 9-11.
Joe McCarthy exploited public fear to expand his personal power and extend his career. Check! George W. Bush is doing the same. The sense of crisis has been prolonged in a highly theatrical, unnatural but effective way. The "war" against terrorism has become a cover for incompetence and misrule and must now be expanded and extended in order to protect the President's career.
Joe McCarthy smeared his opponents, securing the defeat of colleagues in the Senate on the basis of false accusations, terrorizing the press, the State Department and the entertainment industry. Check! Good Americans who oppose Bush have been regularly criticized as un-American and as caving in to terrorism. There is no just cause for these accusations.
The press was, at first, largely powerless against Joe McCarthy, even though many journalists came to loathe him. McCarthy's claims about communists in the government were electrifying. Fearful of his power, and not yet having the facts, the media repeated his lies, which were certainly newsworthy, in so doing giving them force and credibility. Fortunately, the highly respected journalist Edward R. Murrow took a stand against McCarthy and his methods. With the Army-McCarthy hearings, public opposition to McCarthy grew, and the press at last felt free to let loose a withering barrage of criticism. With the exception of Murrow's courageous stand, the public led the press on both sides of McCarthy's rise and fall.
On this point of resemblance to George W. Bush, check, with reservations. The mainstream press has yet to drum up the courage to oppose George W. Bush with real vigor or to expose his failings as they deserve to be exposed. Journalists are as afraid of being called un-American as everyone else, don't want to appear soft on terrorism, and don't have the time to verify every presidential miss-statement and factual distortion. In the meantime, the stream of falsehoods and "spun" truths the President and his surrogates daily inflict on us actually are newsworthy, and so get a great deal of play in the press. As a result, the President's take on many subjects is widely believed by a public now too rattled to think straight. Americans who tend somewhat to paranoia in the first place have proven easy to manipulate and provide a solid base of support for Bush despite evidence of the administration's awful failures that ought to be compelling to rational minds.
Where is this Thing Going?
Eventually, we, as a people, are going to sort this out. Perhaps Bush will get a second term and we'll have even more to think about than we do now. Most of us are only going to get "historical perspective" years from now. Here's what were going to feel:
1) Regret. That we lost so much momentum as a just nation in an era of tragic mismanagement and error. People feel that way now about all the Hollywood people Joe McCarthy ruined. It was a waste of human potential. A political detour in which the country's energy and attention were squandered on an unjust and unworthy cause. We see a lot of our past like this, unfortunately. Test yourself. How do you feel about the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. What about the Cherokee Trail of Tears? How about Viet Nam? Got any pangs about Hiroshima? When you think of our nation's past, doesn't it strike you that slavery was a shame? Well, we're going to regret George W. Bush, too. We'll wish we never knew him.
2) Embarrassment. Yes, it's hard to admit you were wrong. It's hard to make a mistake and own up to it. Remember, it took people actually casting ballots to put George W. Bush in the White House. Some of them don't want to admit it now. In the future, that group is going to grow. Give it twenty years and scarcely anyone will want to admit it. It will mean we were fooled. It will mean we didn't have the discernment to see that Bush is unfit for his office. It will mean we made a grievous mistake with wide-ranging consequences. You'll be embarrassed every time you think about it. Who says they supported Joe McCarthy today? Who was his friend? Nobody!
3) Dismay. Why? Optimist though you may be, you can still acknowledge that some mistakes are irreversible. George W. Bush has a penchant for that kind of mistake. It's not just Iraq. When he undertakes to mess something up, he does the job right. Social Security, NATO, the Environment, relations with France, federal finances, jobs, whatever. If you want it destroyed, George W. Bush is your man. We won't be able to just say we're sorry and get back to where we were. In some cases we won't have the economic resources to repair the damage flowing from his errors for two or three generations, or maybe ever. Joe McCarthy was a sideshow compared to this. He just didn't have the scope of George W. Bush. The man is as talented a wrecker as anyone who ever held office in this country. Bar no one.
Your Challenge
Every U.S. presidency is historic, perhaps, but in the present case, we need to get historic perspective early. We need to anticipate the historical meaning of this present-day political experience. So, try to extrapolate a bit. Stretch your mind to imagine how this thing is going to play out. Travel through time in your mind. Try to be rational. Try to be realistic. Read some history. Compare. Contrast. We're just as vulnerable as the people in the history books, and right now, we're taking it on the chin. We can't stand up to bad management like this indefinitely. Nations and peoples invariably and inescapably suffer under misrule. We are no exception. History is efficient, like nature, and no respecter of persons. So defend yourself. Get historical perspective now, and vote against George W. Bush!